Lionheart, conjunto de hardcore californiano, pronto lanzará su segundo larga duración, Built on Struggle. Para ello, el conjunto permite escuchar el corte Brothers Keeper. El LP se pone a la venta el 18 de enero e incluye apariciones especiales del ex-frontman de 100 Demons, Bruce LaPage, Dave Nassie de Suicidal Tendencies y Bleeding Through, Karl Buechner de Earth Crisis y Brandan Schiepatti de Bleeding Through.
"La canción es sobre mi hermano," comenta el cantante Rob Watson. "Él pasó por problemas de abuso de sustancias y encarcelamiento y este es mi apoyo para él."
4 comments
Good guy in the middle of two bad guys? Sounds like sohiemtng that I could get into. I mean GRRR football men in tight pants .SHIT! GRRR benchpress dudes at the gym WHAT IS WITH ME TODAY?! GRRR squat thrust .close enough
Short, sweet, to the point, FREE-exactly as information should be!
I’m middle class and I don’t utserdnand that. Why should someone more successful pay more in taxes? Isn’t that discrimination?The definition of discrimination is: Discrimination is the prejudicial or distinguishing treatment of an individual based on his or her membership or perceived membership in a certain group or categorySo exactly what is fair making another person pay more in taxes, especially if the work 80hrs a week for that extra income? I know people that are rich that put in that amount of time or more. I don’t, but I’m not saying to tax those that work their butts off either.It seems wrong to me to punish those that work so hard for their money. Especially since the pay the majority of taxes already. Our tax system already is progressive So the rich already pay more than everybody else. I think it’s funny that people say, oh they got a tax break yeah, mostly because they gave their money to charity!!! Those evil rich dudes, how dare they give their money away to the needy instead of the government. lol
While it is easy to spoof the From: header, it is more diifcfult (or impossible) to spoof all headers. However, I don’t think people should have to verify an email for its genuineness.I don’t see the point of sending through Gmail with another email address as the From: header. If you have another email address, why not send from there? (You can still forward incoming mail to Gmail or elsewhere so you don’t have to check regularly everywhere.) OK, if you regularly use Gmail, OK, but if you still have some contact with the institute with the other email address, you can log in and send the email from there.Another point is that while the From: header is easy to spoof, sending email to it will get it to the rightful owner, assuming a) such an owner exists and b) the account has not been hijacked. So, if I get email from , I can send an email there and if I get a response, I can be sure it is THE Sean Carroll (and confirm that he sent the recommendation). However, if I get an email from or whatever, the same procedure gets me a response from the owner of that address, who might not be THE Sean Carroll.There are legitimate reasons for spoofing the From: header (I think spoofing is too strong here, since it implies something illegitimate). This in itself (e.g. sending with an academic From: via Gmail) shouldn’t be frowned upon. I can understand someone wanting to see an academic address in the From: header though. (Again, the fact that it is easy to spoof is not the point, since I can reply to it and confirm anything I need confirmed.)